The limits
Site audits are metered separately from the hourly check
quota, and scheduled runs are not metered at all — the
monitor cap bounds them instead. One 500-page audit would otherwise consume half a Pro account’s hour, and
the two features would starve each other.
Signing in raises your limit rather than lowering it. A free account can always
do more than a stranger — otherwise signing in would be a downgrade.
A sliding window, not a bucket that empties on the hour
Timestamps are stored, not counters. Your allowance is “requests in the last sixty minutes”, which means it recovers continuously instead of all at once — so there is no cliff at the top of the hour and no incentive to wait for one. Requests that are denied are not recorded. Hammering a limit you have already hit does not extend it.Headers
Every response carries the current state:x-ratelimit-reset is seconds until the oldest request in your window falls
out — the point at which you regain one unit, not a full reset.
A 429 adds retry-after, also in seconds:
What the budget is keyed to
Anonymous requests are keyed by IP. Signed-in requests are keyed by account, which means the quota follows the person rather than the network — an office behind one NAT shares a bucket while anonymous and stops sharing the moment they sign in.Sign-in emails have their own, much tighter limit
Five per hour, counted per address and per IP. Limiting only by IP would leave an email-bombing vector: a hundred addresses from one machine is caught, but one address from a hundred machines is not — and the victim is whoever owns the inbox. A rate-limited login still answers202 with the usual message, because saying
“too many attempts for this address” would confirm the address is worth trying.